![]() |
While Honda Beat and Mazda AZ-1 was bounded in Japan, Suzuki Cappucino enjoyed greater sales success in Europe. Undoubtedly, its pretty look was one of the reasons. Power came from a 657 c.c. turbocharged 3-cylinder with 12 valves. Performance was so-so, but fun to drive and own. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Tested by Autocar

Designed
by 2 Japanese ex-racing drivers, Tommy Kaira ZZ was assembled in UK for
better sourcing for components and mainly sold back to Japan. The welded
aluminium space frame chassis was covered by glass-fiber body like many
British specialty sports cars, thus ensured a kerb weight of 730 kg to
compete with Lotus Elise. The engine came from Nissan Primera - 2 litres,
16 valves four-cylinder, now fed by racing motorbike's carburetors instead
of fuel injection. The result was a little bit rougher at low speed but
it became very strong at high rev - 185 hp.
In many ways, it seemed to be the Japanese version of Lotus Elise, although some 40% dearer. Not only having similar chassis, similar weight and dimensions, both mid-engined and open top, ZZ was designed to be a small sports car with amazing performance but without much concern about comfort. If you think it must be an imitator to the wonderful Elise, you are wrong. ZZ actually appeared one year earlier than the Elise, although European got known to it later.
Its engine was stronger yet smoother than Elise's Rover K-series engine. Faster as well. In many ways it was rawer and more racing-car-like than the Elise: gearchange and pedals were heavier but accurate, it rode stiffer although still acceptable. Cornering limit was higher due to the grippy 205 tyres, this also resulted in less accessible oversteer than Elise or Caterham.
The cockpit was as raw as a real racing car - exposed gear linkage, no trimming, no radio nor any other equipment. Even windows and soft top were lacking. The only sunshine protection was an optional double-bubble roof made of fiberglass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Tested by Autocar

However spectacular this sounds to be, the most important to supercar is the powertrain and handling. In this aspect, Vector lost marks although tried its best - the GM-sourced pushrod V8 was made of aluminium in head and block, displaced at 6.0 litres it was already mega size, but still fed by two Garrett turbochargers (with intercoolers) running at rather light pressure. The outcome was claimed to be 625 horsepower and 630 lbft of torque. Good numbers, but don't expect the pushrod V8 to be as sweet and revvy as those Italian V12s. Worst of all, it was mated to a THREE-speed automatic transmission which used to serve GM's heavy vehicle because no existing manual gear box could cope with the tremendous torque. If this was not enough to ruin the driving experience, the old non-independent DeDion tube rear suspension must be enough to let you rethink Vector's commitment to handling. We know American muscle cars used to emphasis straight line speed while ignoring cornering ability.
Vector claimed it could top 218 mph. Considering its angular shape with a Cd of probably 0.55, I would be surprised if it could touch 300 km/h (186mph).
The
next prototype, WX3, was even more controversial. Undoubtedly, it got a
much smoother shape which was not only more wind-cheating but also looked
more modern. The V8 grew to 7 litres, in normally aspirated form it was
claimed to be delivering 700 hp (who believe a pushrod V8 could do that
?) and in twin-turbo form it output 1200 hp, nearly matching the most powerful
tank in army. The claimed top speed was 260 mph, 0-60 mph in 2.6 sec ....
Oh, my God ! I hope this monster V8 wouldn't burn itself out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Tested by R&T

Strange, a very strange supercar. Yamaha OX99-11 was a supercar built by UK's Ypsilon Technology under Yamaha's financial support, powered by a detuned Yamaha formula one V12 engine. Unlike Ferrari F50's engine, this one was really detuned from the racing engine, with the same 3.5 litres displacement, 5 valves per cylinder or 60 valves totally. Of course, in order to make it durable and reliability for road use, it was detuned to 400 horsepower "only", which occurred at record-high 10,000 rpm. It still offered a magic specific output of 114 hp per litre, which was still unmatched by F50.
The very strange styling was artistic, although not everyone liked it. Observe the bubble glass roof and you may confuse it with a F15 jet fighter. F15 has longitudinally-positioned seats, so did OX99-11's 1+1 seating plan. The front end just acted as an additional front spoiler for enhancing downforce, therefore no luggage space was incorporated. Like Formula One cars, an air box intake was located above the roof and rammed fresh air directly into the engine compartment. Overall speaking, body panels were beautifully crafted and painted.
We don't know how did it drive, although the 1000 kg kerb weight must ensure fairly well acceleration. Everything else was unknown because the car actually failed to find a single customer. Being priced at 0.9 million pounds and born during economic recession, in addition to many competitors like Jaguar XJ220, Bugatti EB110 and McLaren F1 around, it was not too strange to know that not a single car was sold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|