| Company Info | Back to new car index |
|
| Related models : Nil | |
| Picture
Gallery: MX-5 |
Related topics: Nil |
| Versions
included
here: General, Roadster Coupe, 2008 facelift |
|
The
Chinese saying "Everybody sees winners as kings and losers as thieves"
applies to Mazda MX-5. When it was launched in 1989, many European
motor writers described it as a copycat to the original Lotus Elan,
criticized it for looking too feminine, laughed it for running too
slow. 16 years later, the MX-5 still standing solidly on the top of the
affordable roadster segment. With over 700,000 cars sold, it surpassed
the record set by MGA/B/C to be the world's best selling sports car of
all time. Now everybody sees it as a King. Admittedly, the original MX-5 was really a copycat to Lotus Elan. Its rear drive chassis, skinny tires, brilliant steering and suspension setup make it incredibly agile and playable in the twisty. It proves that you don't need huge power and grip to get exciting, provided you have a well balanced chassis and interactive controls. In this way, it follows 100% the formula set by Lotus Elan. However, Mazda succeeded to bring the driving fun of Lotus at a bargain price and reliable build quality that only the Japanese can achieve. This is what it made it so successful. The new MX-5 Mazda
had revised the MX-5 two times, one in 1997 and one in 2000. But
strictly speaking the revisions still belong to the Mk1 car, as they
did no fundamental changes to the chassis. This means, while some
people refer the new MX-5 as Mk3 or Mk4, it is actually the second
generation. In the language of Porsche, if the original MX-5 were the
original 911, then the 2005 MX-5 would be 996, while the previous 2
revisions were 930 and 964. See the difference ?At the first sight, the new MX-5 is not very beautiful. It looks bolder, stronger and straighter. While the Mk1 looked sleek, light and nimble, the new car looks like a solid brick, just with edges and corners smoothened. Part of the reason is the high and flat bonnet, which is designed to comply with the new EU pedestrian safety law. This law requires substantial clearance to be left between the bonnet and the engine so that the bonnet can absorb the impact energy when a pedestrian is hit onto it. Unfortunately, it kills the sloping front end a sports car desperately needed. Inside,
the cabin design is another disappointment. For this pure sports car we
expect a "simple is beautiful" design theme like BMW Z4. But in fact
its design is too complicated and fuzzy. The center console is
definitely the ugliest part of all, which could have been found in any
economy sedans. After the stylish RX-8, we can't help disappointed with
the exterior and interior design of the new MX-5.From practicality point of view, however, the new cabin is definitely better. Not only provides slightly more space all round, the materials and build quality are markedly improved. The fabric roof is even easier to operate. It is still a manual job (to keep cost down), but what you need is just to disengage a latch at the windscreen and push the soft roof rearward, and then it will recess into a dedicated storage space behind the seats. The whole operation can be done in your seat, no need to climb out the car like Pontiac Solstice. With the roof down, you can enjoy fresh air without troubling by too much buffeting. What a pity you can no longer rest your arms naturally on the top of the door as before, because the shoulder line is raised along with the bonnet. Admittedly, all other new roadsters have the same problem. The new
MX-5 grew just 4 cm in length and 4 cm in width. Therefore it is still
a very compact car. Its chassis gained 22% torsional stiffness yet the
kerb weight is up by only 10 kilograms. This means a lot of weight
saving materials have been used, such as aluminum bonnet, aluminum
suspension control arms and most important, the new MZR engine has
aluminum block and thermoplastic intake manifold. The longitudinal
engine is also moved 13.5 cm rearward in order to achieve 50:50 weight
distribution and concentrate the mass around the center of the car. Now
the whole engine locates behind the front axle, qualifying as a
front-mid-engined car like RX-8. Also following the RX-8, it uses
double-wishbones suspensions up front and 5-link suspensions at the
rear. The
powerplant of MX-5 is a 2.0-litre twin-cam 16V MZR engine. It is lifted
from Mazda 6, getting higher tuning, a 2-stage intake manifold and S-VT
variable valve timing to the intake side. In Japan and USA it is rated
at 170 horsepower at 6700 rpm, accompany with 139 lbft of torque. That
is considerably more powerful than the old car's 146 hp 1.8-litre
engine, no wonder R&T recorded 0-60 mph in 7.0 sec and 0-100 mph in
21.5 sec. That's about 1 second and 3 second respectively faster than
before. That
performance might not be a headline in nowadays. But you should know
performance has never been the most beautiful part of the MX-5. It is
the interaction between the car and the driver that counts. First of
all, the linear and free-revving engine is a good companion to the
driver, as is the slick and short gearchange from the superb gearbox.
Over rough surfaces the suspensions absorb bumps better than the old
car. Coming close to a bend, apply braking, the progressive pedal is
easy to modulate. Turn the nicely weighted wheel, the turn-in is
instant, showing how little weight hanging at the nose. In the corner
the wheel also transmit streams of road feel into the driver's hands.
At the same time, the MX-5 corners noticeably faster and flatter than
the old car - this is the biggest difference of their cornering manner.
Trail the throttle, the rear end moves out in a progressive way. Prod
the throttle and it resume balance. So easy, so playful. Few sports
cars can be as playable at the limit, certainly not those big power,
wide rubber machines. Since the very beginning, throttle steer has been the core value of MX-5. We are glad that the new MX-5 retains this DNA. Simultaneously, it gained higher performance, higher cornering limit, sharper turn-in and nicer ride. This is not easy to achieve. You know, most other roadsters lost driver interaction during the modernization process. In this way, the Mazda engineering team is definitely successful. What a pity their design studio did not submit a more beautiful proposal ! |
| The above report was last updated on 22 Sep 2005. All Rights Reserved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Front-engined, Rwd |
|
|
|
|
4020 / 1720 / 1245 / 2330 |
|
|
|
var intake. |
Inline-4,
dohc, 4v/cyl,
VVT, var intake. |
|
|
|
|
1998 cc |
|
|
|
|
170 hp / 7000 rpm |
|
|
|
|
139 lbft / 5000 rpm |
|
|
|
|
6M |
|
|
|
|
double-wishbone / 5-link |
|
|
|
|
All: 205/45WR17 |
|
|
|
|
1120 kg |
|
|
|
|
130 mph (est) |
|
|
|
|
7.0 sec (est) |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
Click Here |
|
|
|
|
||