Ford USA

Company Info  Back to new car index  
 

Ford Mustang

Related models : Nil
Picture Gallery: Mustang Related topics: Mustang classic
Versions included here: General,  GT500GT500KR
 
Mustang has been around us for 40 years. Most people still remember its golden days from the mid-60s to the late 70s, but since 1979 it has never received any major revision. Unbelievably, Ford let its Fox platform soldiered on for 25 years, let it became tired and outdated, only relied on low low price to get sales. More unbelievably, although it was always rated by AutoZine as the poorest car in its segment, the Mustang still caught 140,000 buyers in 2003. It still has a lot of loyal fans. 

Thanks God, in 2004 Ford finally gave Mustang what it deserved - a new generation. The new Mustang has its styling going back to its glorious days, resembling the finest Mustang design in the 60s and 70s. But it is also interpreted in a modern way, not just a retro car. Most people seems happy with its styling. 

The new Mustang has grown a lot in all dimensions. It is 20mm wider, 60mm taller and 120mm longer overall, while the wheelbase is stretched by a massive 150mm to improve cabin space. Inside, there is plenty of room for front passengers. The rear also gets more, much-needed legroom, although headroom is still tight for 6-footers. Like the exterior, the cabin is decorated like a classic of the 60s, especially with the optional chrome bezel covering the dashboard. The visual effect is undoubtedly delicious, but a closer look will immediately find the plastics are actually nasty and cheap, while build quality is as low as its price suggests.  

What is the price then? in the United States, the new Mustang is sold for an amazing US$20,000 for the V6 model and US$25,000 for V8 model. In terms of performance per dollar, nothing can beat it. 

The new Mustang is built on an all-new platform - some said it is based on the DEW98 platform of Lincoln LS / Ford Thunderbird / Jaguar S-Type, but in fact they have little in common, probably only the MacPherson struts front suspension and the 5-speed automatic gearbox are shared. The DEW98 platform is too sophisticated and expensive for the use in Mustang. As Ford wants to continue selling it as the cheapest performance car on the market, any advanced technologies are ruled out, even including independent rear suspensions. This means it continues to ride on a solid live axle rear suspension, a thing disappeared in European and Japanese production cars for at least 20 years!  

Of course, this live axle is a new design instead of carry over from the outgoing car. It incorporates 3 links and a Panhard rod for better control, but you can forget what the press release said, as it would have led you believe live axles were the best suspensions in the world. The point is, using the non-independent suspension saves US$300 production cost on each Mustang, which is crucial to its keen pricing and profitability. In the down side, as every automotive text book tells, live axle suspensions have higher unsprung weight thus can never achieve the same ride quality as a properly tuned independent suspension. Moreover, as both wheels are solidly attached together, its handling is easier to be upset by bumps.  

Apart from rear suspensions, the new chassis has nothing outdated. It is 31% stronger in torsion, taking the absolute value to a world-class 20,300 Nm/degree. That's not far behind Lamborghini Gallardo's 23,000 Nm/degree. The stronger bodyshell relieves the burden on the suspension setting, improves both handling and ride. On the other hand, the new Stang has modernized its old-fashion proportion, pushing the front axle forward and pushing the left and right wheels closer to the body boundary. The former improves front-to-rear weight distribution to 54:46, the latter increases tracks by 61mm (while body width increased by only 20mm). These modifications help improving its handling balance. 

The Mustang is a straightforward machine, powered by a torquey engine and drive the rear wheels via a 5-speed manual or 5-speed automatic gearbox. There is no trickery suspensions, while electronic aids are limited to the basic ABS and TC.  

As before, the Mustang is offered with a V6 and a V8, the former especially attracts a lot of female buyers. The 4.0-litre V6 is naturally the budget choice. It is a simple sohc and 2 valves per cylinder design, lifting straight from Ford's trucks. It develops 210 horsepower and a useful 240 lbft of torque. Compare with the outgoing 3.8-litre push-rod V6, it is not only more punchy but also noticeably smoother and quieter. 

The outgoing Mustang GT was powered by a 260-horsepower, 4.6-litre V8 with sohc and 2 valves per cylinder. The new V8 is still a member of this Modular V8 family, but it is nearly another story. Firstly, its block and pistons are converted to aluminum alloy to save 34 valuable kilograms from the front axle. Secondly, the sohc cylinder heads now drive 3 valves per cylinder for faster breathing. In addition, it is equipped with VCT variable cam timing, enabling the engine to run at higher compression ratio without resorting to higher Octane fuel. The V8 produces 300 horsepower (40hp up from the outgoing V8) and 320 lbft of torque.  

So how does it perform on the road?  

Subjectively, at the bottom end the V8 does not feel as torquey as traditional Detroit V8s, needing more rev to get into sweet zone. This is just because it lacks cubic inches compare with other American V8s. However, once it is on rev, it has enough power to propel the Mustang GT from zero to 60mph in 5.3 seconds. Then the ton is arrived at 13.5 seconds. This put it at the same pace of Pontiac GTO (the rebadged Holden Monaro) and ahead of all other rivals. Remember, the Mustang undercuts the GTO in price by some margin. 

Surprisingly, the live axle suspensions is more refined than expected. Just like GM already proved in its push-rod V8s, modern engineering can sometimes improve old technologies to the extent that you couldn't believe. On really broken surfaces, the Mustang's non-independent rear suspension does show its age, where it cannot filter the shock as well as modern multi-link or double-wishbones suspensions. However, on better road you will be hard to tell what kind of suspensions it uses. The ride is firm and controlled, decent for a performance car.  

At the limit, where the old car would get nervous, the new Mustang keeps its rear wheels firmly planted on the road, thanks to the Panhard rod and the rock-solid chassis. In this way, it corners with great confidence. This is also helped by the high level of grip and stability it displays.  

The new Stang is an inherent understeerer. It has sufficient power and chassis adjustability to play throttle oversteer, but this doesn't mean it can match the agility of Nissan 350Z. In most aspects, the Fairlady beats the Mustang convincingly. The only area Mustang scores higher is styling (which is rather subjective) and straight-line performance.  

To launch the Mustang at the lowest price, Ford sacrificed not only IRS but also cabin quality (and durability, I suspect) and most important, vision. The New Mustang might be all-new, but it brings no new idea. Has it move forward? I don't think so. It is a very conservative car, just try to repeat what it predecessors did in the past 40 years. 

* VCT (Variable Cam Timing): You might wonder how Ford can use VCT in a single-cam cylinder head. Ford calls it "dual-equal" variable cam timing, implying the phase shift angle of intake cam mirrors to the exhaust cam. For example, if the intake cam shift forward by 25 degrees, the exhaust timing is delayed by 25 degrees. This is of course not an optimized design in engineering point of view, but it does add little cost compare with engines with twin-cam and individual VCT actuator for each camshaft. 
 

The above report was last updated on 17 Jan 2005. All Rights Reserved.
 

Mustang - the first Pony car

In the 60's, Ford's top executive Lee Iacocca created a new kind of cars called "Pony cars" by launching the first generation Ford Mustang. The idea was to make a cheap sports coupe by using mass-production V8s and other shared components. Besides, a long lists of options including engines, equipments and decorations were available so that the customers could tailor-make their cars according to their taste. 

Mustang became a huge success, not only earned Iacocca a CEO position in Chrysler, but also made itself the first and only sports car exceeding 1 million units production. Meanwhile, General Motor responded with Pontiac Firebird and Chevrolet Camaro, which rivalled with Mustang for 3 decades. 
 

The above report was last updated on 17 Jan 2005. All Rights Reserved.

Mustang Shelby GT500

Fast Mustangs have never been our cup of tea. To appreciate them, we need to recalibrate our taste, forgetting all the indicators we used to assess cars, namely, technology, refinement and handling. We have to put 100% weighting on power and performance, and remind you, the latter had better to be expressed in the form of quarter-mile time. Hot rod / muscle car / pony car lovers never listen to other people. They have their own way to evaluate a car good or bad. Sadly, Mustang GT500 was designed to please these people.

The car takes its name from the 1967 Mustang Shelby GT500, a car modified by Carroll Shelby using a 355hp 7.0-litre (428cid) V8. The new version also borrows Carroll Shelby's name for marketing purpose, but it was developed entirely by the now defunct SVT (Special Vehicle Team) of Ford under the chief engineer of Mustang, Hau Tai-Tang. After all, the 83-year-old legendary tuner no longer involves car development.

Hau Tai-Tang's approach has been controversial. Last time he bet on solid live axle suspensions for the new Mustang, and now from sales figures we all know he has won. This time he put his money on a truck engine. Well, some said the 5.4-litre DOHC 32-valve supercharged V8 was derived from the one serving Ford GT supercar. However, we should note that it has replaced the GT's aluminum block and dry sump with a cast-iron block and wet sump like Ford's heavy duty truck engines. It saves money, but adds dozens of kilogram to the nose of the car and raise the center of gravity a lot. The taller engine needs a power dome on the bonnet to house.

Another change is the supercharger. Hau found the GT's Lysholm (screw-type) supercharger too expensive, thus replaced it with a Root-type supercharger. The cheaper supercharger produces both more and less – more unpleasant supercharger whine, and less boost pressure, dropping from 13.5 psi to 9.0 psi. As a result, the engine produces 500 horsepower and 480 lbft of torque, down from the GT's 550hp and 500lbft.

Nevertheless, no one expect a Mustang to boost Five Hundred Horsepower (just like no one expected Ford Five Hundred so underpowered, by the way). It is hard to believe the Mustang can be more powerful than Ferrari F40, the world's fastest car 15 years ago. Moreover, at US$42,000, the GT500 must be the world's cheapest 500-horsepower car. For the same money, you cannot even buy a base Corvette !

Naturally, the supercharged V8 feels immensely torquey right from bottom end, but it doesn't feel as powerful as its horsepower figure suggested. Blame must go to the 1778 kg kerb weight. That cast-iron block, supercharger kits, gearbox and bigger brakes put nearly 200 more kilograms to the car compare with the 4.6-litre Mustang GT. Road test result by Car & Driver confirmed this: it took 4.5 seconds to do 0-60mph, over 10 seconds to 100mph. Plus, top speed is regulated at 155 mph to avoid embarrassed by the 0.38 drag coefficient. The GT500 breaks no speed record. If there is any, it must be "the world's slowest 500-horsepower performance car".

Admittedly, such performance level is still outstanding for the price. Moreover, it delivers such performance more easily than any previous fast Mustangs, thanks to the adoption of electronic launch and traction control. Plus, the clutch is smooth and progressive, a vast improvement from the old SVT Cobra. Unfortunately, the heavy duty Tremec 6-speed gearbox is far from slick.

Chassis modifications include stronger springs and thicker anti-roll bars, wider tires, new alloy wheels (though remains 18-inch) and Brembo front brakes with 4-pot calipers and 355mm ventilated discs. On the downside, the heavyweight engine and transmission worsens front-rear balance from 54:46 to 57:43, while the solid live axle rear suspension of the regular Mustang is retained (note: the previous SVT Cobra employed independent suspensions).

On the road, the GT500 never handles like a 500-horsepower performance car should. You can feel its high center of gravity as well as the weight at the nose. Hit the brake pedal and the nose dive. This explain why no other performance cars opt for iron-block engines and wet sump lubrication. The only area you feel it goes like a 500hp performance car is the way it rides – very hard, or even harsh on rough surfaces.

The setting of the chassis bias towards mild understeer, which is understandable considering how much torque transfer to the rear tires. On glass smooth race tracks, you can throttle steer it from understeer to oversteer. The smooth and honest steering encourages you to play it. However, on normal roads the scene is vastly different. Bumps and road irregularities can easily upset the ancient solid axle rear suspension. Hit a bump mid-corner will cause the rear end jump and side way, blame to that horrible unsprung weight. Even on motorway, you need constant steering correction to keep it running straight.

Hau Tai-Ting tried very hard to bring super performance into his affordable Mustang. But frankly speaking, the current Mustang is not the right car for so much power. It needs a more sophisticated suspension and engine, but then the car won't be cheap enough to justify its cheap packaging. There is no magic in the performance car field.
  
The above report was last updated on 17 Jun 2006. All Rights Reserved.
    

Shelby GT500KR


Pricier than BMW M3, Nissan GT-R and Corvette Z06, is it too expensive for a pony car ?

40 years ago Ford built a limited edition Mustang called GT500KR, where KR stands for “King of the Road”. It was the most powerful and fearsome Mustang ever made. 40 years later, Ford wants to repeat history by introducing a car with the same name. The new GT500KR is derived from the production GT500, but it is a limited edition - only 1700 or so units will be built in a 2 year production run. Each car is priced at US$80,000, in contrast to the GT500’s US$45,000. This make it pricier than BMW M3, Nissan GT-R, Chevrolet Corvette Z06 and nearly matches Dodge Viper ! Isn’t it too expensive for a pony car ?

To answer this question, let us go through the list of modifications it got. First of all, the 5.4-liter supercharged V8 got revised programming, a cooler intake system and freer exhaust to deliberate another 40 horsepower. That means a total of 540 hp. Maximum torque also increases by 30 pound-feet to 510 lb-ft. The 6-speed manual transmission remains intact, but it gets a shorter-throw shifter to make it feel less industrial. In addition to a shorter final drive ratio (3.73 instead of 3.31:1), the car is more responsive in acceleration. 0-60 mph is reduced by 0.2 seconds to 4.3 seconds. 0-100 mph should be under 10 seconds for the first time. Nevertheless, GT500KR is still significantly slower than Viper and Corvette Z06, both could go from 0-60 in less than 4 seconds and 0-100 in around 8 seconds. Despite of a powerful engine, the Mustang has some 1770 kilograms to haul.


This car is anything but King of the Road

The regular GT500 was notorious for poor handling. GT500KR tries to regain some respect by adopting a stiffer suspension tuning, lower ride height (by 20mm up front and 15mm at the back), a carbon-fiber bonnet (which saves 7kg from the front axle) and stickier Goodyear Eagle F1 tires. Aerodynamics are also improved by new air splitters (also made of carbon-fiber) and diffusers, although no one would assume it match the standard of European cars. Compare with GT500, the KR is better balanced and more tied down to the road. Its handling characteristic is more predictable. Its chassis appears to be less overwhelmed by the tremendous torque. That said, you won’t forget the weight at its nose and its unsophisticated suspension. After all, the Mustang is not a dedicated sports car, therefore it is hopeless to follow a GT-R, M3, Z06 or Viper in twisties.

Coming back to our question: is GT500KR overpriced ? Yes, seriously. Worse still, losing battles in both straight line and corners to its cheaper rivals, this car is anything but King of the Road.

  
The above report was last updated on 9 May 2008. All Rights Reserved.

Specifications

Model
Mustang V6
Mustang GT
Mustang GT500
Layout
Front-engined, Rwd
Front-engined, Rwd
Front-engined, Rwd
L / W / H / WB (mm)
4765 / 1877 / 1385 / 2720
4765 / 1877 / 1385 / 2720
4765 / 1879 / 1384 / 2720
Engine
V6, sohc, 2v/cyl.
V8, sohc, 3v/cyl, VVT.
V8, dohc, 4v/cyl,
supercharger.
Capacity
4009 cc
4605 cc
5409 cc
Power
210 hp
300 hp
500 hp
Torque
240 lbft
320 lbft
480 lbft
Transmission
5A
5M
6M
Suspension (F/R)
strut / live-axle
strut / live-axle
strut / live-axle
Tyres (F/R)
All: 215/65 R16
All: 235/55 ZR17
255/45ZR18 / 285/40ZR18
Weight
1562 kg
1592 kg
1778 kg
Top speed
135 mph (est)
150 mph (est)
155 mph (limited)
0-60 mph
6.9 sec*
5.2* / 5.3** sec
4.5 sec*
0-100 mph
19.0 sec*
13.2* / 13.5** sec
10.3 sec*
AutoZine's rating
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
See illustration to spec.
Figures tested by: * C&D, ** R&T
 
Model
Mustang GT500KR
-
-
Layout
Front-engined, Rwd
-
-
L / W / H / WB (mm)
4775 / 1877 / 1367 / 2720
-
-
Engine
V8, dohc, 4v/cyl,
supercharger.
-
-
Capacity
5409 cc
-
-
Power
540 hp
-
-
Torque
510 lbft
-
-
Transmission
6M
-
-
Suspension (F/R)
strut / live-axle
-
-
Tyres (F/R)
255/45ZR18 / 285/40ZR18
-
-
Weight
1770 kg
-
-
Top speed
155  mph (limited)
-
-
0-60 mph
4.3 sec (est)
-
-
0-100 mph
N/A
-
-
AutoZine's rating
Click Here
-
-
See illustration to spec.
Figures tested by: -
 

Copyright© 1997-2008 by Mark Wan
Return to AutoZine home page